Author name: Danniel Iskandar

Psychology

Crash Course Psychology #13

Crash Course Psychology #13 is where I learn about Memory and some basics on how it works. For context, Crash Course inspired me to learn the basics of psychology, so I’ve made it my mission to watch the entire Crash Course Psychology playlist and paraphrase each episode in my own words. This journey wouldn’t have been possible without the Crash Course team, so many thanks to them! To showcase what I learnt, here is my personal paraphrase of episode 13: Memory Memory. Definition: Technically, it is learning that has persisted over time. Information that has been stored and in many cases, can be recalled. How can it be recalled? Well, so far with what we know, it’s typically done in these 3 different ways; So how does information (data, experience, etc) become memory? Memory Formation Explanation #1 The first draft explanation of this was apparently done in the late 1960’s by American psychologists Richard Atkinson and Richard Shiffrin. They figured enough about memory formation to propose that the process can be broken down in to 3 stages: Memory Formation Explanation #2 Over time, psychologists have recognised that this classic definition did not cover all of the processes involved. So, later generations of psychologists revisited this and updated it to the more comprehensive concept of Working Memory. Definition: conscious, active processing of incoming auditory and visual spatial information, and of information retrieved from long term memory. Increasingly, we also think Working Memory involves both explicit and implicit processes. When we store information consciously and actively, that’s an explicit process. At the same time, we are not conscious of every little detail we absorb. Working Memory often transfers stuff we are not even aware of to our long term memory storage. This is the implicit process, because we don’t have to actively concentrate to do it. Explicit Memory. Definition: Memory of facts and experiences that one can consciously know and “declare”. Implicit Memory. Definition: Retention independent of conscious recollection. Classically Conditioned Associations are a good example of implicit processes turning into implicit memory. This explains why sometimes we associate certain events with certain feelings, even if unintentionally. Implicit processes do this automatically. Automatic Processing. Definition: non-conscious encoding of incidental information, such as space, time, and frequency, and of well-learned information, such as word meanings. Also difficult to shut off. So we learn and remember those learnings either using explicit or implicit processes, or both. Types of Long Term Memory Additionally, we have different kinds of long term memory. To illustrate, a couple of them are; There are other types of long term memory, and we are still researching what they are and how these work. Not to mention, the connection between our psychology and biology of this whole thing. Memory Tricks Next, let’s talk about techniques to utilise our memory to our advantage. There are many out there. Here, we cover; There are many techniques. Find the one that works for you in your given circumstance! Deep & Shallow Processing Indeed, memory tricks like the above help explicit processing. However, how well we remember depend on how deep we dig through the levels of processing. The deeper, the better. These levels include; But to make it retain even more, then we connect whatever we’re trying to remember to something meaningful or related to our own personal, emotional experience. Make it personal to you! In the end, how much information you encode and remember depends on both the time you took to learn it and how personally relevant you made it for you. Conclusion of Crash Course Psychology #13 Our memory helps makes us who we are. They upkeep our relationships with others and how we carry ourselves approaching our lives. We are constantly adding memories, and it reshapes ourselves as a result. They define us. However, memory is not an all or nothing thing. From research, memory seems compartmentalised. We don’t yet fully understand how it works so research is ongoing. In the end, memories are a vital part of our lives. Without memory, we become vulnerable and unsure when navigating our lives moving forward. Danniel’s thoughts on Crash Course Psychology #13 Enjoyed this learning of Psychology? Test your knowledge against these quick custom Kahoot! quizzes I’ve made based on the episode above: This is the easy mode and this is the hard mode for Crash Course Psychology #13. Also, do check out what else Psychology related I’ve learnt from my Psychology blog! Credits for Crash Course Psychology #13 Original Content & Media by Crash CourseContent Consumed and Paraphrased by Danniel IskandarParaphrase Proofread byParaphrase Reviewed by

Performing Arts

SPART

Taylor’s Society of Performing Arts During my enrolment in Taylor’s University Lakeside Campus, I signed up with the Taylor’s Society of Performing Arts, or ‘SPART’ for short. For the duration of my time in that society, I was provided a platform to grow and hone my craft as an actor. This post will cover some of the things I’ve learnt through that 3 year experience. SPART – SPARTIES SHORTIES 2016 Upon joining the club, the first opportunity presented to me was the annual club showcase. Gung-ho in my first semester, I auditioned and even got selected. The year was 2016. The annual showcase is called (at least back then) SPARTIES SHORTIES. Hence the title, “SPARTIES SHORTIES 2016”. I got the role of Benjamin. My play was titled ‘Despair’. Benjamin was a jaded, under-appreciated corporate slave living with his partner who ends up in a heated argument with him during dinner. Juxtaposing the scene was the other half of the dinner table belonging to a different couple, showcasing a much calmer discussion. My main takeaway from this role was experiencing the process of fully engulfing my whole being in a visualised skin representing my transformation in to the character. Through this experience, I got to immerse myself in to my character’s mind space. That let me see the world through my character’s eyes. I have my then director to thank for that. SPART – SPARTIES SHORTIES 2017 My next opportunity I got from SPART was the annual showcase the following year. This time, I was cast as a neglectful father unaware that his daughter had been taking pills. Looking back, my biggest takeaway was recognising how passive I was in the process. I was on autopilot, waiting for detailed instructions from the director. What I should have done was take initiative and explore bold, diverse interpretations of the character on my own. Instead, I acted more like a robot awaiting instruction, rather than an artist exploring inspiration. I’ve since learned that actors are not mere soldiers awaiting orders; we are storytellers, responsible for breathing life into our characters and actively shaping the process of what character we may display onstage. SPART x UM – BETAS The next opportunity I got from SPART was the BETAS gig. Since that was technically under University of Malaya and not under SPART entirely, I’ve written it as a separate reflection. Essentially, my main learning here was being aware of what I’m communicating as my character, non-verbally. SPART – SPARTIES SHORTIES 2018 This time, I got the role of an eight year old boy. The story is about a young orphan boy who gets separated from his sister at the orphanage due to getting adopted. My character had three different aspects I had to display truthfully on stage, two of which were foreign to me. They were; being an eight year old, being an orphan, and having a sister. Being a 21 year old, I thought I only had to revisit my younger self in order to be able to portray myself as an eight year old successfully. I forethought that the challenges to me would have been portraying believably being a young orphan getting adopted and having a sister, because both of which I had never experienced. I had to completely imagine and realise from scratch both aspects. This really tested my acting capabilities, as I had to embody a couple of things I knew nothing of. In one rehearsal, we had a professional actor come by to evaluate our performance and give feedback. Surprisingly, he gave feedback mainly towards me being an eight year old, not the two forethought challenges. He gave advice I found later in my acting career to be significant. He had told me that if I wanted to improve it, I should spend time around other eight year olds and observe them. This meant that if I ever wanted to act as something that I am not familiar with, all I had to do was surround myself in that particular something. Observe them. Do Observational Learning. He practically gave insight on how to act that’s applicable to almost any role. I didn’t realise how powerful this insight was until later in my acting career. Thanks to this experience, observation is now in my actor’s toolbox. SPART x ADP – Fright Night SPART collaborated with the Taylor’s American Degree Transfer Program, where they had to provide scare actors for the program’s own halloween event. The location was in the Taylor’s ADP faculty, which also acted as a specific site for the story. The ADP faculty was designed similarly as an American school, so the setting was a haunted school. My role was a demented school boy. This was my first scare actor opportunity. This was also my first site-specific theatre performance. This was my first gig where I had to stay in character while interacting with audience members. So this opportunity gave me experience to stay in character against a dynamic environment. The challenge was holding character focus, to sustain my perceived imaginary circumstances. The learning here was realising that as a character, having a solid character focus is vital for maintaining performance against distractions. Key Takeaways as an Actor To summarise, my biggest takeaways that aid my acting journey to this day are;

Psychology

Crash Course Psychology #12

Crash Course Psychology #12 is where I learn about legendary psychologist Albert Bandura and some basics of Social Cognitive Learning. For context, Crash Course inspired me to learn the basics of psychology, so I’ve made it my mission to watch the entire Crash Course Psychology playlist and paraphrase each episode in my own words. This journey wouldn’t have been possible without the Crash Course team, so many thanks to them! To showcase what I learnt, here is my personal paraphrase of episode 12: Challenging Behaviourism At the time, Behaviourism was the dominant view of Psychology. That learning is through conditioning, association, rewards and punishments. Psychologist Albert Bandura challenged this view and focused on how learning can occur through observing and imitating another’s behaviour. Thus, proving that there’s another way, besides behaviourism, to learn. Bandura’s research moved 20th century experimental psychology from pure behaviourism in to what we now call Social Cognitive Learning. This added additional dimensions of social and cognitive aspects in to the learning process. Additionally, behaviourism’s approach had its limitations. While most, if not all animal species can learn through association, it’s learning is limited by its biology and natural tendencies. Learning through association is not learnt equally. For example, humans by nature are more taste averse, than sight or sound averse. Some animals, like birds, are sight oriented. This means that species can more easily learn associations that help them thrive or survive, and not all associations are learned equally. Learning beyond the Behaviourist’s way Learned associations get more complicated with humans, because what we learn doesn’t only influence our behaviour, it also shapes our attitudes. This is already one added layer to the human experience of learning. We refer to this as Cognition. Definition: our thoughts, perspectives, and expectations. This is an important factor in our learning process. This means that sometimes, we can think our way out of associations. Another important factor is our Social Context. As Albert Bandura figured out. A person’s social context like friends, family, culture, life stressors, etc can also contribute to associated reinforcements. Additionally, Humans are capable of Latent Learning, even unintentionally. Humans are constantly developing Cognitive Maps, or mental representations of our surroundings. Animals also exhibit both latent learning and cognitive maps. So learning is not just associating a response with a (positive or negative) consequence. There’s thinking happening too. This kind of thinking is a big part of Observational Learning. Observational Learning. Definition: Learning by observing others. This means that you don’t need direct experience to learn, you can simply observe. One way to do this is through Modelling. Definition: the process of observing and imitating a specific behaviour. Animals also exhibit observational learning. This may explain why social observation shapes behaviour, especially for those without higher level functioning, like in children. Using technology to maybe understand why Neuroimaging has shown us that even when someone else is undergoing a rewarding experience, our own reward neuron pathways light up. Many scientists believe this may be the work of a type of brain cell called Mirror Neurons. Definition: Neurons that fire when performing certain actions or when observing another doing so. However, this neuroimaging technology and mirror neuron research is still very new and we still barely understand any of this. At the moment, if we combine these findings and Bandura’s work, it’s revealing that there is apparently a strong connection between observation, imitation, and learning. Conclusion of Crash Course Psychology #12 Today, it’s almost common knowledge that humans can learn through observation and imitation. This is all thanks to legendary psychologist Albert Bandura. Until his experiments, this form of learning had not been studied in a scientific way yet. Even though Behaviourism proved one way to learn (conditioning, association, rewards, punishments), Social Cognitive Learning proved another way to learn (observation, imitation). This method of observational, social learning starts in our very early ages and our role models are powerful influences. Often times, these are our parental figures. Modelling is important in this context. This is important because either positive or negative modelling can prompt similar behaviour to those observing. Another factor to consider is that what we see, feel, and learn as children often carries over into adulthood. It is indeed important to be aware of what we are observing and recognise what we may be imitating as a result of it. Danniel’s thoughts on Crash Course Psychology #12 Enjoyed this learning of Psychology? Test your knowledge against these quick custom Kahoot! quizzes I’ve made based on the episode above: This is the easy mode and this is the hard mode for Crash Course Psychology #12. Also, do check out what else Psychology related I’ve learnt from my Psychology blog! Credits for Crash Course Psychology #12 Original Content & Media by Crash CourseContent Consumed and Paraphrased by Danniel IskandarParaphrase Proofread byParaphrase Reviewed by

Psychology

Crash Course Psychology #11

Crash Course Psychology #11 is where I learn about behaviourism and the basics of how the brain learns. For context, Crash Course inspired me to learn the basics of psychology, so I’ve made it my mission to watch the entire Crash Course Psychology playlist and paraphrase each episode in my own words. This journey wouldn’t have been possible without the Crash Course team, so many thanks to them! To showcase what I learnt, here is my personal paraphrase of episode 11: Ivan Pavlov Originally Pavlov aspired to be a Russian Orthodox priest, but instead he studied medical science and the digestive system for 20 years. Earning Russia’s first Nobel prize for expanding our understanding on how stomachs worked. However, he didn’t study human stomachs because procedures were cruel. He studied dog stomachs. Through these studies and observable behaviour of these dogs, he discovered a simple but important form of learning: Associative Learning. Before that, just for context, let’s define learning. For Psychologists, we can define learning as the process of acquiring, through experience, new and relatively enduring information or behaviours. This is not the only way to define and describe learning, but it’s the one we will use when discussing with the behaviourist paradigm. In the context of behaviourism, learning is acquiring survival behaviour through experience. Associative Learning Definition: When a subject (humans, animals, etc) links certain events, behaviours, or stimuli together in the process of conditioning. Associative learning is arguably the most elemental, basic form of learning a brain can do. Pavlov found that humans aren’t the only ones that learn. He found that animals can exhibit this Associative Learning. One example of this is Classical Conditioning. Classical Conditioning. Definition: A type of learning in which one learns to link two or more stimuli and anticipate events. (1) Before conditioning: A Unconditioned Stimulus naturally leads to an Unconditioned/Natural Response. Separately, there is also the Neutral Stimulus, which doesn’t lead to the Unconditioned/Natural Response. (2) During conditioning: You combine both the Unconditioned Stimulus + the Neutral Stimulus to achieve the Unconditioned/Natural Response, together repeatedly until the association between the 2 stimuli are made, in a stage called Acquisition. (3) After conditioning: The Neutral Stimulus has now become a Conditioned Stimulus, because it now causes the former Unconditioned/Natural Response to become a now Conditioned Response. We think Classical Conditioning could be an adaptive form of learning developed to help the subject survive environments. Additionally, methodologically, Classical Conditioning shows how a process like learning can be studied through direct observation of behaviour, without all the messy feelings and emotions. Along with Pavlov, B.F. Skinner and John B. Watson also preferred this and embraced Psychology as all about objective, observable behaviour. Another example of Associative Learning is Operant Conditioning. Operant Conditioning Definition: A type of learning in which behaviour is strengthened if followed by a reinforcer or diminished if followed by a punisher. Basically, increasing behaviour with a good consequence (like a reward), and decreasing behaviour with a bad consequence (like a punishment). B.F. Skinner is famous for designing his ‘Skinner Box’, an operant chamber where he could observe a rat’s behaviour in a controlled environment. Here, he learned some interesting things. Positive Reinforcement. Definition: A positive reinforcer is a stimulus that, when presented after a response, strengthens the response. Operant Conditioning behaviour requires Shaping. Definition: A procedure in which the reinforcer guides a behaviour towards closer approximations of the desired behaviour. With each successful attempt towards the desired behaviour, you gain what are called Successive Approximations. You do this until the desired behaviour is fully achieved. This marks the end of Shaping, and one cycle of Operant Conditioning. In everyday life, we are all continuously reinforcing, shaping, and refining our behaviours to adapt to the world. Either intentionally or unintentionally. Both for positive reinforment, and negative reinforcement. Negative Reinforcement. Definition: A negative reinforcer is any stimulus that, when removed after a response, strengthens the response. Positive reinforcement is getting a reward after a desired behaviour. Negative reinforcement is removing an upsetting stimulus after a desired behaviour. It’s important to note that negative reinforcement is not the same as punishment. Punishment decreases a behaviour either positively (gaining something upsetting) or negatively (losing something important). While negative reinforcement removes the upsetting stimulus to increase behaviour. The many factors needed for Conditioning Conditioning is actually way more complex than it seems. There are additional layers beyond the surface. For example: Primary Reinforcers. Definition: An innately reinforcing stimulus, like one that satisfies a biological need. Conditioned Reinforcers. Definition: A stimulus that gains its reinforcing power through its association with a primary reinforcer. Reinforcement Schedule. Definition: A pattern that defines how often a desired response will be reinforced. Extinction. Definition: When you don’t get enough continuous reinforcement, the progress towards a desired behaviour dies. Partial (Intermittent) Reinforcement. Definition: Reinforcing a response only part of the time. Results in slower acquisition, but greater resistance to extinction, compared to continuous reinforcement. Conclusion of Crash Course Psychology #11 Behaviourism. Definition: A school of thought that saw Psychology as an empirically rigorous science, focused on observable behaviour and not unobservable internal mental processes. Pavlov’s work contributed to the foundation of the Behaviourist school of thought, viewing Psychology as a science with emphasis on proof. Today, we see Psychology as the science of behaviour and mental processes. Despite how we see Psychology today, Pavlov’s contributions were tremendous. His research ushered in more experimental rigour & behavioural research right up to present day. Learning, beyond the definition used to discuss the behaviourist paradigm, is what allows us to adapt to our environments and survive. It’s also worth noting that John B. Watson was in a time where toxic biogenetic determinism advanced by eugenics were growing. So his position of behaviourism can be seen as not only his idea of how people behaved, but also his rebuttal to his environment. Danniel’s thoughts on Crash Course Psychology #11 Enjoyed this learning of Psychology? Test your knowledge against these quick custom Kahoot! quizzes I’ve made

Performing Arts

BETAS

Bestari English Theatre Appreciation Showcase In January 2018, I got to act in a short play within University Malaya’s signature annual event called ‘BETAS’. This stood for “Bestari English Theatre Appreciation Showcase”. During my time in Taylor’s University, I was an active member of the Taylor’s Society of Performing Arts. As a member, I got the opportunity to audition for University Malaya’s event ‘BETAS’. Upon a successful audition, I got to act in a short played called “Chicken Soup For The Soul”. I got the father role. Using inspiration from a previous role for BETAS From rehearsals, the father role eventually drew inspiration from another character from a different play. That character was Benjamin, the starring role I played in ‘Despair‘. One of five plays during Sparties Shorties 2016, a collection of short plays by the Taylor’s University Performing Arts Society. Benjamin was a jaded, under-appreciated corporate slave living with his partner. Similar to Benjamin, the father role too was jaded, and lived with both his wife and children. Drawing from a character I’ve already embodied, it was only natural to achieve similar results with the new father role. Of course, the role of the father came with new emotional nuances I had to honour. Unlike in Despair, where my only scene partner was the girlfriend—requiring direct, spoken interaction—the father’s dynamic was more complex. There was a silent tension with his wife, which allowed me to ignore her presence while shifting my focus toward the children. The performance relied more on subtext and presence than dialogue. Much of the father’s performance hinged on what wasn’t said, maintaining silence and playing with eye contact. I had to express exhaustion, frustration, anger, sadness, and resignation. Characters like this father and Benjamin are the first of their kind in my acting journey, and certainly won’t be the last. I carry the lessons from these roles with me as I continue to explore complex character nuances in my evolving acting career. Enjoyed reading what I learned? You can find more performing arts related learnt content on my blog here, do check it out and learn what I’ve learned too!

Psychology

Crash Course Psychology #10

Crash Course Psychology #10 is where I learn about Hypnosis and other altered states of consciousness. For context, Crash Course inspired me to learn the basics of psychology, so I’ve made it my mission to watch the entire Crash Course Psychology playlist and paraphrase each episode in my own words. This journey wouldn’t have been possible without the Crash Course team, so many thanks to them! To showcase what I learnt, here is my personal paraphrase of episode 10: Hypnosis Hypnosis and its many variations have been around for centuries. The western version of it came about around the 18th century. This was by German physician Franz Mesmer when he tried to treat all medical problems by putting his patients in to trance like states. Here, he claimed to align their “internal magnetic forces”, which he called Animal Magnetism. Many of his patients did indeed feel better, but not because of his theory of Animal Magnetism. Instead, Mesmer unintentionally used the healing power of suggestion. Mesmer’s theory of Animal Magnetism has no scientific backing. Eventually, other physicians discredited Mesmer. Hypnosis A calm, trance like state during which you tend to have heightened concentration and focus, and in which you are typically more open to suggestion. In a previous episode, we loosely defined consciousness as our awareness of ourselves and our environment. Consciousness is at work both whenever we’re awake and asleep dreaming. So Hypnosis is a good example of an altered state of consciousness. You’re fully conscious in a clinical sense, but also not what you consider a normal waking state. Altered states of consciousness include hallucinations, and the effects of psychoactive drugs. Both of which, don’t need each other. Hypnosis has been observed in lots of studies that focused on empirical evidence and Hypnosis has been used effectively in treatments for many things. These include stress, anxiety, weight loss, and chronic pain. However, even though you are more open to suggestion when hypnotised, you do not lose control of your behaviour. This means that hypnosis can’t make you act against your will. Hypnosis is also not reliable to recall deeply buried memories. Our brains don’t store memories of literally every single thing that happens to us. We only permanently store some of them and even those tend to mutate over time. Only about 20% of us are thought to be highly hypnotisable. This simply means these people are just more open to suggestion. And they won’t do grave acts that go against their will. They’re more open to mellower suggestions like interpreting a stimuli differently. Or more receptive to thoughts and suggestions. How does Hypnosis work? So far we know that hypnosis can increase your suggestibility. However, experts still debate what exactly constitutes a hypnotic state and how to achieve it. Remember, just because we observe something, doesn’t mean we understand it. What something does and why it does it, is difficult to determine from observation alone. Here are a couple of theories explaining how Hypnosis works. One looks at hypnosis as a phenomenon of social influence. This means that hypnotised subjects may feel and act like “good hypnotic subjects” if they trust their hypnotist to direct them. Another theory suggests that hypnosis utilises dissociation, a special dual processing state of “split consciousness”. Dissociation is a sort of detachment from your surroundings. This ranges from mild spacing out, to a total loss of your sense of self. We all do some variation of this. Dissociation helps in some situations, like when it helps to not focus on our thoughts and feelings. An example of this is when hypnosis may help to ease pain by selectively not attend to that pain. Clinicians can do this by guiding patients into a relaxed, spaced out state, further guiding them with positive thoughts and suggestions. This is all voluntary by the participant. So in legitimate clinical hypnosis, clinicians ask people to dissociate, not make them dissociate. Drug Tolerance & Neuroadaptation Drugs are a common way to voluntarily enter an altered state of consciousness. There are the legal drugs, like coffee, alcohol, prescription drugs. Of course, some people develop problems, such as building tolerance to any substance, legal or illegal. Tolerance is the diminishing effect with regular use of the same dose of a drug, requiring the user to take larger and larger doses before experiencing the drug’s effect. This is our brain chemistry adapting, in a process called neuroadaptation. Further continuing and this can lead to addiction. Psychoactive Drugs Psychoactive Drugs are chemical substances that alter your mood and perception. They go right to the brain’s synapses and mimic the functions of neurotransmitters. They also tap in to the user’s psychological component; the user’s expectations about that substance usage. However, if you expect to behave a certain way with a particular substance but was given a placebo and still behaved within expectation, that’s what’s called a Placebo Effect. However you consume psychoactive drugs, we will cover them in 3 general categories: Depressants Things like alcohol, tranquilizers, and opiates. They bring you to be more mellow, slow body functions, and suppress neural activity. (Alcohol): Historically, the world’s favourite depressant is alcohol. People drink alcohol to get parties going, but not because it stimulates them, but rather to get the effects of a disinhibitor. Disinhibitors impair your brain’s judgement areas, while reducing your self-awareness and self-control. Alcohol also disrupts memory formation. (Tranquilizers): Similar to alcohol, tranquilizers/barbiturates, all depress nervous system activity. This makes them applicable to ease anxiety or insomnia, but high doses can negatively impact memory and judgement. And really high doses, or bad interactions with other substances like alcohol, can kill you. (Opiates): Opiates, like the flower opium and it’s derivatives morphine and heroin, work similarly in depressing neural activity. It envelopes the brain in feeling no pain. However, if a brain keeps getting outside opiates, it will eventually stop producing it’s own natural pain killing neurotransmitters, endorphins. If this happens, withdrawal is extreme. Stimulants Opposite of depressants where they depress neural

Psychology

Crash Course Psychology #9

Crash Course Psychology #9 is where I learn about sleeping and theories as to why we dream. For context, Crash Course inspired me to learn the basics of psychology, so I’ve made it my mission to watch the entire Crash Course Psychology playlist and paraphrase each episode in my own words. This journey wouldn’t have been possible without the Crash Course team, so many thanks to them! To showcase what I learnt, here is my personal paraphrase of episode 9: What and Why we Sleep Sleep is just another state of consciousness. It is not the brain or body shutting down. Technically speaking, sleep is a periodic, natural, reversible and near total loss of consciousness. This makes it different from hibernating, being in a coma, or being under anaesthesia. We spend around 1/3 of our lives asleep and we know it’s vital for health and survival, but Science still haven’t concretely concluded why we sleep. Here are what Science thinks so far; How we Sleep While we don’t know the exact reasons why we sleep, we know a lot of how we sleep. We use the Electroencephalograph, or (EEG) machine that measures the brain’s electrical activity. It was in the early 1950’s that grad student Eugene Aserinsky used this machine on his son. There he discovered that the brain doesn’t just “power down” during sleep, as many scientists thought. Instead, he discovered the sleep stage that we now call REM. Rapid Eye Movement (REM) is a recurring sleep stage during which vivid dreams commonly occur. It’s an interesting, not yet fully understood, period of sleep where the brain is full of activity despite it and the body being asleep. Sleep specialists use technology similar to the EEG and have shown that we experience 4 distinct stages of sleep, each defined by unique brainwave patterns. The 4 stages are; Rapid Eye Movement (REM), NREM-1, NREM-2, NREM-3. The cycle goes like this; The Sleep Cycle 0) During the day, your endocrine system keeps you awake by releasing “awake” hormones like cortisol by the Adrenal Glands. 0.5) Arrival of the night, your endocrine system releases “sleepy” hormones like melatonin by the Pineal gland. Your brain gets relaxed but still awake, a level of activity measured by EEGs as Alpha Waves. This is that feeling of sleepiness and slowed breath just before falling asleep. 1) The moment you fall asleep is clearly evident on an EEG reading because those Alpha Waves immediately transition in to waves that look obviously different. This is the irregular non-Rapid Eye Movement stage one (NREM-1) waves. It’s in this first stage that we may experience Hypnagogic Sensations, which are those weird moments of falling in your bed. 2) As you further relax, you move to NREM-2 stage sleep. This is where your brain shows bursts of rapid brain wave activity, called Sleep Spindles. Here, you’re definitely asleep. 3) Then comes NREM-3 stage sleep, indicated by the slow rolling Delta Waves. It is up to this point, in these first three stages, that you can have brief and fragmentary dreams. 4) The most important stage of sleep, full REM sleep. Most known for when your eyes move like crazy while you are asleep and this is where your vivid dreams happen. During this time, the motor cortex sends signals, but the brainstem blocks them, leaving your body essentially paralyzed except for the eyes. Finally, this whole sleep cycle repeats itself every 90 minutes or so. Sleep Deprivation Lack of sleep causes a myriad of problems, making it a killer blow to your health, mental ability, and mood. It’s a predictor for depression. It can cause weight gain because it disrupts hunger arousing and suppressing hormones. It causes immune system suppression and slows reaction time. Sleep Disorders Dreams Not known for certain, but we have some ideas: Why do we dream? Also not known for certain, but we have some ideas: The are other theories. One argues that dreams are part of our cognitive development, suggesting that dreams draw from our knowledge and understanding of the world, mimicking reality. Another theory, the neural activity model, focuses on the way REM sleep triggers neural activity, positing that dreams are merely accidental side-effects. Oneirology: The study of dreams. It’s a mix of neuroscience and psychology. Conclusion of Crash Course Psychology #9 For now, scientists continue to debate the function of dreams. However, one thing we know for certain is that REM sleep is vital for us, both biologically and psychologically. Imperative to our health! Questions after Crash Course Psychology #9 Enjoyed this learning of Psychology? Test your knowledge against these quick custom Kahoot! quizzes I’ve made based on the episode above: This is the easy mode and this is the hard mode for Crash Course Psychology #9. Also, do check out what else Psychology related I’ve learnt from my Psychology blog! Credits for Crash Course Psychology #9 Original Content & Media by Crash CourseContent Consumed and Paraphrased by Danniel IskandarParaphrase Proofread byParaphrase Reviewed by

Performing Arts

Foundations of Acting II by Pat Chan

Foundations of Acting II by Pat Chan is a university elective I completed during my enrolment in Taylor’s University Lakeside Campus. Additionally, this is the follow-up course to Foundations of Acting I. This post highlights my completion of the follow-up course. “Walk-about-character” on campus One of our assignments in order to complete the course was to identify a type of busker character and act as that character around campus. Being the cheeky personality that I am and Ms. Pat knowing this after mentoring me fairly closely from Foundations of Acting I & ‘A Flower’s Promise’, industry player Pat Chan decided to allow me a difficult role: a male stripper. Within bounds, of course. I needed many layers of clothing to work with, as it was a public performance after all. What’s more, this was in Malaysia. Surprisingly, not only were there sufficient customers, the money was good too. Though, it was more of the male patrons buying my service for their female friends, rather than the females coming to me on their own accord. Nevertheless, a successful busk it was. Showcase for Foundations of Acting II by Pat Chan: Saya Anak Malaysia (Baru) As a Summer Semester elective, we had 9 weeks to pull off a show. Plus, we did this on top of our “walk-about-character” assignment. Besides industry veteran Pat Chan, the finale showcase also had another industry player involved in its process. Playwright Ridhwan Saidi. He helped with the finale show script. Pat Chan directed us. Pulling this show off was our final exam. Below are some pictures from the show. Rehearsal feedback during Saya Anak Malaysia (Baru) I was one of the main characters, which meant learning to place faith in myself doing the role. This held some weight for me, as it was my second time ever playing as the lead role in a play. The first time being SPARTIES SHORTIES 2016. I had to believe in my acting capabilities and not allow self doubt hold me back. Being in a lead role wasn’t familiar to me. Luckily, I turned out to be a natural and didn’t have to worry too much. I focused on acting to the best of my capability, instead of allowing my self doubt get to me. One rehearsal, Ms. Pat gathered us for announcements. She told the group what she needed for the play to be successful. For some, it was to focus more. For others, it was to not allow their insecurities to hold them back. Then came me. She said I was too concerned about the performance of my classmates. Apparently, I was busy giving energy and helping them on scene. This stopped me from putting energy and focus on to myself, which held back my own performance for the entire play. Essentially, she pointed out that because everyone else in the team was lacking in performance, I’ve been pulling myself back to carry everyone else. This comment struck me. Ms. Pat had then told me to not worry about everyone else, and to focus on my own acting. She had also mentioned that instead of trying to help everyone else achieve the same level as me, I should instead strive for the highest level I can reach and set an example for them to strive towards as well. My reflection learning from Foundations of Acting II by Pat Chan This proved to me that I had nothing to worry about regarding my own acting capabilities. However, it also proved to be a lesson where I need to achieve moderation when acting with those that are not at the same level as I am. Instead of always giving my energy and focus onto the others to help them achieve my level, I should instead focus on myself. Do my best. Set the bar higher so that they achieve levels that not only beat their personal best, but also my previous best. Additionally, I should also keep in mind as to not deprive my fellow actors of my energy on stage. While performing, actors also bounce energy off of each other. It isn’t about fully focusing on myself. Nor is it to fully give them your energy the way I did. It is about learning when to do what. Both serve critical roles when done correctly. Hence, rehearsals for acting are also rehearsals for learning how to exchange energies right. Enjoyed reading what I learned? You can find more performing arts related learnt content on my blog here, do check it out and learn what I’ve learned too!

Psychology

Crash Course Psychology #8

Crash Course Psychology #8 is where I learn a little bit about consciousness and selective attention. For context, Crash Course inspired me to learn the basics of psychology, so I’ve made it my mission to watch the entire Crash Course Psychology playlist and paraphrase each episode in my own words. This journey wouldn’t have been possible without the Crash Course team, so many thanks to them! To showcase what I learnt, here is my personal paraphrase of episode 8: What is Consciousness? (At least, covered in Crash Course Psychology #8) It is difficult to describe, at least if you want to describe it sufficiently or appropriately. So for the purpose of learning and discussion, the episode chose to loosely define consciousness as our awareness of ourselves and our environment. This is what allows us to take in information from the world and organise it simultaneously. Other Interpretations American Psychologist William James interpreted consciousness as this continuously moving, shifting, and unbroken stream. Hence where the term “stream of consciousness” came from. Others interpret consciousness as the brain’s flashlight that highlights one thing and then moves on to the next thing. What they have in common, and the point is, is that the conscious experience is forever shifting. One moment it’s on this blog you’re reading, the next moment, it’s on something else. Beyond that moment to moment shifting, consciousness allows us to think big like contemplate life, plan our futures, consider what ifs, and reflect on the past. We experience consciousness so much, yet we know very little of it. States of Consciousness While we life, we go back and forth between various states of consciousness. They are waking, sleeping, and various altered states like dreaming, or physiologically sparked like a drug induced hallucination where you’re tripping, or triggered psychologically. This episode we’re looking at what it means to be awake. Cognitive Neuroscience & Neuroimaging For centuries, scientists learned everything they could about the brain through observation only. Even though a lot was learnt, it was limited. It was the only thing they could do given their technology at the time. With today’s technology, we can see not only the structures, but even the activity inside a living brain! We can see the electrical, metabolic, and magnetic signatures of a brain on a screen for interpretation. Cognitive Neuroscience This is the study of how brain activity is linked with our mental processes. This includes thinking, perception, memory, and language. Important note: Cognitive Neuroscience is one of many integrative disciplines that derive from psychology and neuroscience. All of which reflect a variety of approaches. Most importantly, all of these are relatively new sciences, only scratching the surface of a very complex set of topics. Like other kinds of neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience uses neuroimaging technologies to consider links between specific brain states and conscious experiences. There are multiple ways to scan a brain, here are some of them; Important reminder: Correlation does not equal causation. Knowing where activity is happening while performing specific mental functions can be useful to know, but it does not tell us the whole story. Since we know function is often localised in the brain and how everything psychological is simultaneously biological, it is reasonable to think that our thoughts and emotions could (at least partially) be displayed with the brain activity shown on screen. Additionally, some of this technology is very new. Plus, there isn’t a consensus on how to interpret neuroimaging findings. Dual Processing Dual Processing is the principle that information is simultaneously processed on separate conscious and non-conscious tracks. We have collected a fair amount of evidence to posit that consciousness isn’t singular. Rather, it’s two layers, and both have their own processes and functioning. This is one of the dual process models of consciousness, the idea that our conscious mind thinks explicitly, while our automatic mind simultaneously processes information in the background. All of this weighs down on how we behave. Attention According to some estimates, our senses collect around 11 million bits of information every second (how do these estimates know?). Despite this, we only consciously register around 40 at a time. How do we focus in light of this? With Selective Attention! Selective Attention It’s how we focus our conscious awareness on a particular stimulus or group of stimuli. In turn, this tunes out the rest. However, our automatic mind secretly registers that rest. Still, while we focus on something, most of the other stimuli fade away. The classic auditory example of selective attention is the cocktail party effect. Because in a party where many conversations overlap, you can still focus on the one you’re in. At the same time, when someone nearby mentions something of interest, your attention picks it up. Selective Attention is useful, but it can be dangerous as well. With every action of selective attention, you concurrently activate your Selective InAttention. You can miss even the most obvious things when your full attention is elsewhere. We call this Inattentional Blindness. Magicians understand and use this same concept for their magic tricks, but they call it Misdirection. Magicians also prey on our Change Blindness, which is the psychological phenomenon in which we fail to notice changes in our environment. This means we don’t notice what was different a moment ago versus what is there now. This can be both fun, but also dangerous. Conclusion of Crash Course Psychology #8 In actuality, we are far less aware of what’s going on around us than we think we are. What’s more, this is just for when we’re awake. Imagine our awareness levels and what we fail to notice when we’re in all the other states of consciousness. Watch Crash Course Psychology #8 to see cool examples! Danniel’s thoughts on Crash Course Psychology #8 Enjoyed this learning of Psychology? Test your knowledge against these quick custom Kahoot! quizzes I’ve made based on the episode above: This is the easy mode and this is the hard mode for Crash Course Psychology #8. Also, do check out what

Psychology

Crash Course Psychology #7

Crash Course Psychology #7 is where I learn all about our sense of Perception and how it’s easily influenced. For context, Crash Course inspired me to learn the basics of psychology, so I’ve made it my mission to watch the entire Crash Course Psychology playlist and paraphrase each episode in my own words. This journey wouldn’t have been possible without the Crash Course team, so many thanks to them! To showcase what I learnt, here is my personal paraphrase of episode 7: Perception Previously, we’ve defined perception as the top-down way our brains organise and interpret outside stimuli and put it into context. Our minds are constantly receiving so much of that outside stimuli, especially through the eyes, and the mind has to make quick work of it. Also, our minds do all the work of perceiving, while our eyes and other senses are only feeding it raw data from those those outside stimuli. It’s important raw data, but it’s not what we actually see. What we see happens in the mind. Our senses mean little without our brain’s ability to organise and translate all that data into meaningful perceptions. Perceptual Set What heavily influences our perception, sometimes causing bias, are a myriad of things. Examples include our expectations, experiences, moods, and cultural norms. Things like context, cues received, familiarity, emotions, motivations, all can affect our perception, causing different interpretations to the same stimuli. All these fall under our Perceptual Set, the psychological factors that determine how you perceive your environment. Perceptual Set theory teaches us that what we believe makes us see what we want to see. Most of the time our perceptual set reaches reasonable conclusions, but sometimes they can mislead or even harm us. It’s the basis for many optical illusions. Form Perception Our mind has many ways to perceive all that outside stimuli into something coherent. Below are some of the ways our brain tries to do that. Figure-Ground Relationship The organisation of the visual field into objects (the figures) that stand out from their surroundings (the ground). We essentially organise what we see into two main parts: the canvas and the main focus on that canvas. This applies to non visual fields too, such as listening on a particular sound becomes the figure, while all the other noise becomes the ground. Now that the mind has distinguished the two, it has to perceive something meaningful from them. Rules of Grouping Another way our minds shuffle all the stimuli it receives. It follows rules of grouping, like organising things by; Depth Perception Depth Perception is the ability to see objects in three dimensions although images that strike the retina are two-dimensional. So even though our eyes receive light waves that get focused into 2D images for our retina, our depth perception allows us to see in 3D somehow. Depth Perception helps us estimates an object’s distance and full shape. It is at least partially innate, since babies have it too. We’re able to perceive depth using both binocular and monocular visual cues; Binocular cues Depth cues, such as retinal disparity, that depend on the use of two eyes. Basically we need both eyes to catch these depth cues. Monocular cues Depth cues, available to either eye alone. Helps to determine the scale and distance of an object. The cues are; Motion Perception We use motion perception to infer speed and direction of a moving object. Our brain gauges motion based partly on the idea that objects that look like they are shrinking are retreating, while objects that look like they are enlarging are approaching. This helps generally, but out brains can easily be tricked. For instance, large objects appear to move much more slowly than small ones going at the same speed. Perceptual Constancy In addition to organising what we see based on things by form, depth, and motion, our perception of the world also needs consistency. We call this constancy in Psychology. Perceptual Constancy is what allows us to continue to recognise an object regardless of viewing distance, viewing angle, the object’s motion or illumination. Even changes to its colour, size, shape, and brightness, depending on the conditions, we can still recognise the object. Conclusion of Crash Course Psychology #7 In the end, your perception is about how you understand the world and your place in it, both physically and psychologically. Your sensory organs (eyes, nose, etc) pull in raw data from the world when in contact with stimuli. That raw data gets disassembled into bits of information and then reassembled in your brain to form your own model of the world. Your brain constructs your perceptions. Watch Crash Course Psychology #7 to see cool demonstrations of all the above! Danniel’s thoughts on Crash Course Psychology #7 Enjoyed this learning of Psychology? Test your knowledge against these quick custom Kahoot! quizzes I’ve made based on the episode above: This is the easy mode and this is the hard mode for Crash Course Psychology #7. Also, do check out what else Psychology related I’ve learnt from my Psychology blog! Credits for Crash Course Psychology #7 Original Content & Media by Crash CourseContent Consumed and Paraphrased by Danniel IskandarParaphrase Proofread byParaphrase Reviewed by